T1 Crab Apple: remove to allow columnar Yew to maintain shape T3 Himalayan Birch: crown reduction to 2m on side facing the bungalow (including removal of side branch) to increase sunlight on bungalow and garden T5 Beech: lift crown to a height of 2m allowing more light to reach the flower bed T6 Leylandii: lift crown to height of 2m and reduce the height of the tree to match the height of ridge of neighbour 19 Pelham Avenue and trim remaining sides to improve overall shape of tree T7 Italian Cypress: remove to prevent damage to gutter, wall and foundation of bungalow T8 Weeping birch, rear garden: remove to allow light into garden and onto summer house. Replace with brambly apple tree T9 Ash in neighbouring garden to rear: remove branches which overhang the summer house

T1: willow - reduce height to final height of 5m. Reduce canopy spread to give 2.5m clearance of property. T2: birch - thin canopy 20% T3: palm (next to house) fell to stump

T1 Cherry; Tree has low hanging branches interfering with the public highway and access to home owners driveway. Crown Lift tree to approx 2m-2.5m Reduce spread on North side of tree from approx. 9m to 4.5m from stem, reduce spread on West & South side from approx 7m to 3.5m from stem, reduce spread on East side of tree to clear public highway by approx 1m. Overall height of tree will not be affected. G1 Apple (x3); Crown Lift to approx 2m-2.5m to allow mower access. Crown reduce by approx 1.5m-2m, removing new growth to achieve previous shape and form where applicable, remaining heights will vary from approx 3.5m to 4.5m

Monterey Cypress tree in the front garden (see pictures), I would like to request permission to remove the tree. The reasons for this are as follows: 1. There is evidence of historical land heave within the left side of the building which has previously resulted in the need for rebuilding of the left front brick work of the house.(see attached picture) 2. There is a crack in the left side of the front room beside the fireplace which, in the opinion of Mr Hooper, the builder who is currently working there, is the result of persistent root ingress under the foundations at that side of the house. (see attached pictures) 3. There were numerous roots invading the building below floor level which have been revealed as we have started to replace wooden flooring with a solid floor. (see attached pictures) 4. The tree itself is not in good condition. There is a fissure in the wood which extends through the trunk of the tree from front to back and is threatening its structural integrity. (see attached pictures)

t1 conifer front gate remove. t2 t3 conifers front of house remove. t4 remove bay tree back garden. t5 holly tree reduce by 2m leaving height 7m from base of tree. t5 remove dead lime next to bay tree, t6 large bay tree reduce to 3m in height and 5m crown reduction from base of tree. t7 plumb tree reduce by 1m and creating a shape cutting back to suitable secondary growth points. t8 second large bay tree reduce height by 3m and spread 5m from base of tree. t9 remove conifer near garage.

The works are to fell a semi-mature thuja which is in contact with the front of the house and the neighbouring property, and is casting excessive shade

x7 Trees at 65A: T1 and T3 Sycamore trees; Clean out deadwood, reduce canopy spread over driveway. T2 Evergreen Oak: Fell, leans out over highway. Conifer trees T4,T6 and T7: Fell Cedar T5: remove lowest branch over shed and reduce canopy spread to 3m radius minimum, reshape. x2 trees at 65 Bargate: 65T1, 65T2; Yew trees, reduce canopy back to boundary fence x4 Trees at Fryston House FT1, FT2, FT3, FT4: Holly and Yew trees; cut back to boundary fence. ,

As shown on the map, Tree 4 Chestnut: crown lift horse chestnut to 6-7m requesting permission to reduce canopy spread over house by approx 3m. Tree 3 Chestnut: Fell Tree 2 Chestnut: Fell tree to right of gate - poor specimen. Tree 1 Lime: Canopy lift line to 5m and reduce lateral spread of upper crown to reshape it accordingly

Silver Birch - fell because of excessive shading, encroaching on telephone wires and low amenity value. The tree is close to the house and root growth is now threatening the foundations and has caused structural damage to the boundary wall. Replacement of one standard Acer already planted and established 6 ft to the front but growth of this is now being restricted by the Silver Birch. Complaints also received from neighbour, Mr Malcolm Giles at 15 Woodrow Park about loss of daylight and restricted view due to size of tree. We were granted permission to reduce the size several years ago (5 years?), but it has already grown back. The size is such that it has become out of proportion to the rest of the garden.

Ash (T1): Crown lift over house and Chimney to give approx. clearance of 2m