Amended works specification T1 Yew has been withdrawn for the 211 Notice and no longer to be considered. 2. Ash tree - the proposal is for it to be felled- in the corner of the front garden- its branches overhang onto the roundabout and this is a hazard as er have witnesses lorries hit the branches as they are driving. * the way the tree is growing is that is pushing against the fence which will over time be damaged by the tree * the tree blocks out much light in the front room - hence room is always cold- mould in it last Winter * do not plan to replace - it is on a corner and hazardous to oncoming traffic at the roundabout- nor do we want the fence to be compromised as it is being now 3- Holly tree- would like this to be felled- it has a * low amenity value- blocks out light and we had to have a holly tree felled years ago as it was bending towards the roof of the house and a health and safety hazard

The tree lies within the garden of a house that lies perpendicular to my home. The tree is at their side of the fence edge to my garden. The branches are hanging over my back garden and are nearly touching the roof. The previous owners maintained the tree and removed over hanging branches. This was around 25 years ago. More recently as the problem has increased I have approached the owners who have refused to take any action. It has now become a serious cause for concern. It blocks all my natural light and prevents the natural enjoyment of the garden. I would like to take action to remove the offending branches and trim back to the boundary. I will pay for the work and will be using a qualified and experienced arborist. I believe its a sycamore tree. I have looked at the tpo map and there is no tree listed as being where the tree is on the tpo map, directly facing the back of my house No 6. HAR/CA15.

I have 5 Leylandii trees at the front of my property we would like to have permission to remove reasons being: 1... We have had previous subsidence on our property , from a neighbouring Leylandii in 2004, 3.5 metres away from our property. The tree was removed and subsidence resolved. 2... The 5 trees we would like to remove are now causing the following issues for us. (a) There are a number of large roots growing across the top of the ground and just under the ground very close to our property. They have lifted our patio area just outside our front door. Which we have now just replaced. We are very worried these trees are going to cause further subsidence to our property. The trees are very large and so close to our house. The closest tree being just 3.5 meters away from the house, with a circumference of 2.8 meters. The estimate height of the trees being taller than a two storey house. (b) ..The trees are cutting out the neighbour's and our light. (c)...The trees are restricting and damaging larger vehicles travelling down the lane. (d)...It is becoming more difficult for us to get house insurance to cover subsidence due to the location of the trees. 3...Once the trees are removed, we would like to put up a 6ft tall closeboard Fence for security and in keeping with what the neighbours in the lane already have. We would then plant a hedge in front of the fence by the lane side for greenery for wildlife. tree 1. Leylandii. 3.5m from house. the circumference of the base is 2.8m and splits into 3 main branches. the mass of branches grow out to the roof of house.The others stop short by 1.5 m as the house sits back there. tree 2. Leylandii 3.7m from house. circumference of base 1.35m. splits into 2 main branches. tree 3. small holly tree/ bush will be staying. tree 4. Leylandii 5.5m from house. 2.4m circumference. splits into 3 main branches. tree 5. Leylandii 5.1 from house. 1.5m circumference splits into 2 main branches. tree 6. Leylandii 5.5 from hous...

4 large Conifer trees labelled 1-4 on the sketch plan. The plan is to remove them down to ground level . They are blocking significant amounts of light and are disrupting the driveway of Andway Cottage, two nearby fences and the shed of 3 Paynes Meadow. They appear to be the only conifer trees on 3 Paynes Meadow and Andway Cottage properties; other trees nearby on Pyotts Hill all appear to be deciduous so they seem out of place in comparison. See conifer tree photos document. 1 Hazel tree (tree 5) & 4 Beech trees - labelled 6-9 on the sketch plan. The plan is to remove them down to ground level. They are very close to the house, less than a meter, and are blocking significant amounts of light and overhanging the roof of Andway Cottage contributing to moss growth on the roof and blocked gutters. See Hazel and beech tree photos document. The work will be carried out by HGS Sherfield on Loddon.

Large Pine tree at front of property - Reduce to ground level. Robinia and Holly - Prune back lower branches overhanging garage roof by approximately 3m. Row of Conifer trees at side of house - Reduce height by 2m and prune sides by 1.5m. Cherry and Hawthorn trees - Prune back by approximately 2m. Row of overgrown Holly trees at rear boundary fence - Reduce height by approx 3m and prune back by 2m. Overgrown Conifer on garden fence line - Dismantle and remove.

Prune Yew (T1) located at the neighbours garden, prune back low limbs over the Summer house back to fence line. Prune Yew x5 group (G2) located at the rear left corner behind the summer house and 4 trees to the right, reduce over roof to clear guttering, prune the upper crown back to old pruning points. Trim side over Box plants at front. Prune Betula Jacquemonti (T3) located at the front of property, Prune off limb growing into Yew hedge. Prune Yew (T4) located at the back fence, Reduce the low branches over fence back to garden side. Prune Yew hedge (G5) located at the overhanging footpath, Trim over footpath hard keeping a green screen

T1 Corsican Pine - Prune overhanging growth to Garfield boundary line. Full height of tree T2 Cypress - Prune overhanging growth to Garfield boundary line. Full height of tree T3 Cherry - Prune overhanging growth to Garfield boundary line. This tree is encroaching over and impacts on the house. Full height of tree T4 Goat Willow - Fell to ground and grind stump. This substantial tree straddles the boundary line of both properties, with the trunk and root structure now within 2 feet of both properties, and height exceeding roof level. It is at risk of causing damage to both properties, and is already pushing against our neighbours outbuilding. It further prevents fencing being erected to define property boundaries, and our side access gate from opening and closing. Both parties have agreed to its removal.

T1 Sycamore - Fell in sections to ground level and treat stump. The tree is situated approximately 3m from the rear corner of number 38 St Johns Rd and low branches are touching or within less than 200mm of the wall, roof, and gutters. Buttress roots are damaging the fence. The biggest problem with the tree is the likelihood of it failing at the low union, known as an included bark union. When several trunks form close to the base, they affect one another's habit. They compete for light and space and end up leaning away from the vertical. Their branches form on the outside of the canopy making the weight bias even worse. Eventually one or more stems usually break away at the union and fall. The tree is left with a huge wound at the base and very often fungal spores colonise. This will usually result in decay and renders the remainder of the tree unsafe. In the case of this particular Sycamore there is no direction that the first failing stem could fall and not cause damage to property or injury to the public. As previously mentioned, it stands a mere 3m from the closest house.

T1 Pear: Fell dead and replace with apple tree; T2 Ash: remove - lowest branch over path; T3 Viburnum: trim 4-5 low branches by 3 metres to allow headroom for path; T4 Prunus Pissardii: reduce 4 lower laterals by 3 metres to alleviate excessive leverage of extended stems over path, steps, fence and road below, and trim upper branches by up to 1 metre around 3 phone lines; T5 Cherry: re-reduce height by 2 metres, reshape remaining crown by 1.5 metres, and remove branches adjacent to neighbouring house and roof by up to I metre.

1. Large fir trees along boundary to business park drive (coloured blue on sketch). These are part of a double row - the other half is owned by the business park and the trees were reduced in height around 2 years ago. Following last years' storms two trees on the other side of our boundary fell and we should like to reduce the 14 on our side by approximately half their height (still leaving them around 15 ft tall, to prevent risk of breakage in high winds in future and also to improve lighting to our property 2. Fir trees coloured green on sketch and leylandii (not coloured but running in line to garage). These were reduced in height two years ago but only by a small amount. High winds last year created some damage with falling branches breaking fences on both sides and we are concerned that future storms may bring whole trees down. In addition, the owners of the business park say that the branches on their side are potentially causing damage to vehicles parked there. We propose to reduce height by 15-20 ft (the trees are around 45ft high) and also to reduce thickness of growth on the far side. 3. Poplar trees coloured in dark blue. These were reduced two years ago but the contractors did not remove as much as requested (or granted) at the time and we are still concerned by the prospect of trees falling in high winds. We should like to do additional work , reducing height to just below the level of the roof of the main house 4. Mulberry Tree (coloured pink) -to reduce it in height by probably 2-3m so that it is slightly higher than what is left of the firs behind, allowing it some additional light. 5. Eucalyptus tree (purple) - lost some high branches in high winds - to be reduced and re-shaped for safety (about 10ft removed, leaving it at around 20ft high) 6. Fir tree at edge of garden (yellow). The reduction would be approx. 4m, in line with the above, potentially with up to 15% thinning of the lower