A large limb fell from this tree last week , it appears to be a 15 or so year lapsed pollard . The cavities appear to extend down from one or 2 central cuts . It is likely to fail again in the near future I would like to reduce it back to the original Cut to remove the danger .

T1 Field Maple - Selectively Crown Reduce - Reducing the height and spread of the tree around 1.5 metres removing more growth on the side towards the barn property to redress overall balance and reduce extension and vigour of codominant stem extended towards barn. (This limb has a poorly formed union close to its base). T2. Field Maple - Remove tree because it is close to boundary fence with insufficient space to develop due to proximity of adjacent Cherry T3 and is beginning to impact on fence. T3. Cherry - Selectively crown reduce - Reducing height and spread by around 1.5 meters to improve crown shape and balance, (particularly needed after removal of T2). T4 Silver Birch - Selectively reduce crown spread by around 0.5 meter to redress crown balance.

t1-3 Silver Birch- Crown reduce by 1.5 metres maximum, due to proximity to house. t4 & 5 Spruce- Remove trees to ground level due to proximity to planned extension and overcrowded planting. Species does not lend itself to being reduced. t6 & 7 - Trees felled prior to decision notice being issued t8 Conifer Sp.- Remove tree to ground level due to proximity to planned extension and overcrowded planting. *t9 on map does not exist* g1 6x Balsam Poplar- Reduce to previous points to continue management of trees. t10 Ash- Crown redcue by 2 metres maximum, due to proximity to road and neighbouring houses. t11 Weeping Willow- Re-pollard to previous points to continue management of tree.

Houeholder applicaton for demolition of conservatory and erection of single storey rear extension and formation of new crown roof over existing single storey flat roof to front

HI, I am the current owner of Old Manor Cottage, 29 Baker Street Waddesdon which is an 1875 cottage with very shallow foundations on a clay ground so it is subject to instability. There are two large conifer trees at the front of my garden that as you face the property are to the right hand side of it. These trees are approximately 2 metres + higher than my property and are causing two issues. They caused historical subsidence in 2003 before I owned the property which needed them to be pruned to stop the roots growing underneath, this took place before 29 Baker Street was included within the conservation area in 2014.( See details from the website : Areas added in the 2014 Conservation Area Review. The 1990 boundary cut through the grounds of 27a and 29 Baker Street. For the sake clarity and in order to avoid confusion the boundary has been extended to include the whole of the grounds of these properties.) I purchased the property in June 2020 and toward the end of last year started experiencing new subsidence issues, we had the ground surveyed by a company called Geobear and found that the issues were as stated above the house is on shallow foundations with an unstable clay underneath and this was being exacerbated by the tree roots growing underneath the house and sucking the moisture out of the clay. They carried out works to drill down to 2 metre depth every 500mm along the front of the house and along the right hand side up to the rear extension and resin inject under the house to stabilise it. They recommended once these works were complete that I could then go ahead and get the conifer trees pruned to reduce the possibilities of any further issues. So consequently I have contacted Bucks Tree Surgeons, Weedon Road, Aylesbury, HP19 9PB. Josh Tel: 01296 392197 Mobile: 07701392197 with a view to having the trees pruned, they have visited an recommended Crowning the two conifer trees by approximately 2 metres in height and also to trim the branches away fr...

There are 2 large ash trees in my garden at 6 Bourton Road which is in a conservation area. I am writing to give notice of crown reduction for both tress following the advice of an arborist and in response to complaints from adjoining properties on McKenzie Close. Back to previous points. 2-3 meters. The branches are overhanging the neighbouring car-park and also the single storey extension on our own property due to recent growth over the last few years. The work will be carried out by a qualified arborist Mr Robert Barnard.

Erection of two single storey rear extensions, new oak frame carport and the replacement of the front porch - Variation of condition 2 (plans), condition 3 (materials) and condition 4 (submission of tree protection measures) on planning application 21/01664/APP

TPO 1996 no 19 INT ID 5694 Silver birch T2, a very large, lovely and healthy tree Tree is now interfering with fence, shed and nearly the side extension to 11 Winterton Drive plus excessive shading to 11 Winterton Drive later in the day. It is encroaching significantly on this property. Application is for a crown reduction of ideally 2 to 3 metres to resolve the above and the ensure the continued health and amenity value of the tree.

Fell Spruce spp. (S1) and Viburnum spp. (V1) both trees are located in a cobbled courtyard and the roots are affecting the cobbled surface. There is also a stone retaining wall which is cracked and due to the close proximity of the stems there is a strong possibility that the roots are also affecting the foundations and the wall however this is not confirmed. Walnut (W1) to be crown reduced by 2m. There are section were branches extend past the natural shape of the crown by 2 - 4m and so where this occurs the reduction will be 4 -6m to be in line with the rest of the reduction. The reason for the reduction is to give the crown complete symmetry with its shape (picture 1) and also to reduce weight to the scaffold limbs where there are signs of decay on some of these boughs. Is the work are permitted a climbing inspection will also be undertaken

T1 -Aesculus, Hippocastanum / X carnea, Horse / red Horse -crown clean canopy removing stubs created by previous works and storm damage, dead, diseased & dying branches, and epicormic growth. T2 -Aesculus, Hippocastanum / X carnea, Horse / red Horse-Crown clean canopy removing stubs created by previous works and storm damage, dead, diseased & dying branches and epicormic growth. T3 -Aesculus, Hippocastanum / X carnea, Horse / red Horse -Reduce by thinning the branches with pruning damage that extend over the baker street pavement removing 20/25% of the photosynthesising material to reduce the load on the defects created by previous pruning works. Crown clean canopy removing stubs created by previous works and storm damage,dead, diseased & dying branches and epicormic growth. T4-Aesculus, Hippocastanum / X carnea, Horse / red Horse - Crown Clean removing stubs created by previous work and storm damage.T5-Aesculus, Hippocastanum / X carnea, Horse / red Horse Reduce by thinning the central stem that grows leaning to the east reducing the bending moment acting on the defect at its base as much as possible removing 25-30% of the photosynthesising material. Crown clean canopy removing stubs created by previous works and storm damage, dead, diseased & dying branches and epicormic growth. T6-Acer-Pseudoplatanus, Sycamore tree, Remove to ground height and poison / grind out resulting stump. T7-Aesculus, Hippocastanum / X carnea, Horse / red Horse- Remove to ground height and poison / grind out resulting stump T9-Aesculus, Hippocastanum / X carnea, Horse / red Horse- Re-reduce canopy to / just above the previous reduction points to reduce the weight being placed on the defects created by the previous pruning works, also reducing the lower canopy to achieve a natural shape & balance to the canopy with the works removing no more than 30% of the photosynthesising material