The work would be the removal of the crabapple tree to due the very close proximity to the boundary wall and to the house. The tree has caused many cracks in the wall and lifting of severalgarden stones. I am concerned over the house foundations being safe and the sewer than runs directly underneath may become blockaged as their roots are likely to get into them . . The tree is leaning into my neighbour's garden, it has more weight on one side than the other making it more susceptible to falling which could cause harm or damage if it were to fall. Dead branches snap and fall off frequently as it has been diagnosed with a fungal infection or a virus. There are often growths that I remove that resemble mushrooms which is a sign that the tree is infected and dying. I have been advise by a tree surgeon that it would be best to cut the tree down and replant a new sapling in a better location.

T1 is a bay tree in the rear garden of number 6 Montpillier villas. The tree is near the property on southern boundary. The works are to maintain the tree at a suitable size and height for its location. This will improve the sunlight to the rear garden which is currently being blocked and affecting the reasonable enjoyment and use if the garden area during the summer months. The works will not be detrimental, nor will it affect the trees amenity value. Rear Garden by House T1 - Bay Fell as close to ground level as possible. Stump of above Apply systemic herbicide to stump to prevent re-growth.

Permission to remove a Eucalyptus that has been cut very badly over the years and is rather unpleasant to look at. Its branches are now close to the house and overhanging gutters. The new owners are looking to landscape and plant new trees and bushes if the tree is removed. The tree is no more than 15 years old

T1) Sycamore - Tree 15m in height. Height of be reduced by maximum of 2.5m Lateral branches to be reduced by maximum of 2m Crown lift to 3m Tree to be reduced due to small size of garden and close proximity of Tree to house. Tree causing a lot of shade to house and garden.

Fell - Large bay tree (between 15-20 feet) in a flower bed next to our front gate (75 Chester Terrace), which is blocking a lot of light from the front of our house and becoming too large for us to manage. The root system is also preventing us from growing many other plants in the same flowerbed.

T21 Pagoda Tree, Sophora japonica. 20% thin and lift off the front of the house to provide more light into property 7 Varndean Holt.

Tree work @ Shawcross 1942 sycamore - reduce by 1-2m 1941 Elm - reduce top by 4m side by 2-3m and raise crown by 6m 1940 Sycamore - remove spur with weak union 1939 Holm oak - reduce entire tree by 2-3m Tree works @ carlton house 1931 Sycamore - remove dead wood 1934 Chestnut - remove to ground level 1935 Beech - raise crown by 6m 1937 Blue cedar - reduce heavy limbs by 2-3m

T143 on TPO schedule Sycamore tree- 4 meters off the top height of the tree and reshape all round, approx. 3 meter reduction of lateral branches to North, East, South and West, crown lift to 6 meters high and remove low epicormic growth. Reasons New owners of the house and garden, the tree has been allowed to grow unchecked by the old owners, some works were undertaken by neighbours on the eastern side of the tree. The neighbours in no. 4 Holly Close are very keen to have major reduction works undertaken, the 4 meter reduction in height would still leave the tree larger than the last time it was reduced all round

T1- Bay tree- remove 1 meter off top height and reduce back on house side T2- Fig- cut to boundary with no. 34 T3- Holly- cut to boundary with no.34

T1 / Tag no. 442 - Sycamore - fell to as near to ground level as is possible; grind out resultant stump; replace with Acer rubrum standard. Significant amounts of structural and vascular roots have already been severed. Is within 2m of newly built structure on development. T2 / Tag no. 443 - Sycamore - fell to as near to ground level as is possible; grind out resultant stump; replace with Acer rubrum standard. Significant amounts of structural and vascular roots have already been severed. Is significantly suppressed by adjacent trees. T3 / Tag no. 444 - Sycamore - fell to as near to ground level as is possible; grind out resultant stump; replace with Acer rubrum standard. Significant number of structural and vascular roots have already been severed. T4 / Tag no. 445 - Sycamore - fell to as near to ground level as is possible; grind out resultant stump; replace with Acer rubrum standard. Significant number of structural and vascular roots have already been severed on NE side; tree has significant lean of approx 10?? to SW, overhanging roadway of the Vale. T5 / Tag no. 446 - Sycamore - fell to as near to ground level as is possible; grind out resultant stump; replace with Acer rubrum standard. Large cavity at approx 300mm AGL; multiple incidences of barbed wire occlusion in lower stem region. Within 4-5m of excavations for house building, meaning severing of major structural and vascular roots on NE side, (roughly 40-50%). T6 / Tag no. 447 Sycamore - fell to as near to ground level as is possible; grind out resultant stump; replace with Acer rubrum standard. Large cavity at approx 300mm AGL; multiple incidences of barbed wire occlusion in lower stem region. Within 4-5m of excavations for house building, meaning severing of major structural and vascular roots on NE side, (roughly 40-50%)