T1 Oak - Reduce by 2m, hanging over road.

T1 - Oak - Remove dead wood and trim as appropriate. T2 - Willow - Remove three boughs overhanging entrance to car park. Reduce overall height by half.

Land to the rear of 19 Foxlydiate Lane T1- Horse chestnut tree - due to excessive shading and tree detritus we are applying for permission to re-pollard back to previous pruning points

T1 Lime - Reduce top of lime tree to previous framework prune points. Reduce side overhanging clients garden (9 Aspens Way) and around right side if looking from Aspens way, back to previous framework prune points, (Around 2.5 -3 meters) to allow more light.

I have consulted with the same tree surgeon (Acer Trees) that completed similar works in 2017 (TPO17/068). The following tree works is requested - Mature Oak (T1) - bottom right hand corner of the garden. Crown thinning - 15% to provide improved light into the surround properties. General deadwood maintenance is to be removed as required. Within scope of this application is the tree in relation to the following properties 13, Davenham Rd, 28 and 30 Royal Worcester Crescent. Out of scope is no. 15 Davenham Rd, which has already had similar tree works completed recently. A diagram will be attached to this application illustrating the tree position and surrounding houses.

T1- Reduce Beech hedge to approx 1ft above fence height + trim. Mimic exactly application for 1 Birmingham Road, B48 7TB

T1 Cedar : Lift 3 x lowest limbs over drive. T2 Acer in front lawn : Reshape Crown. T3 Cherry in neighbours garden side of garage, cut back crown 2 metres off garage roof.

Our Ref: 213340 Statement of Reasons for Tree Preservation Order Application to fell and treat Oak trees (T1, T2, T3) at: Land adjacent to 8 Greystone Close, Redditch, B98 9HU TPO Ref: 1965 / 93/00004/TPO 1. The above tree works are proposed as a remedy to the differential foundation movement at the insured property and to ensure the long-term stability of the building. 2. The above tree works are proposed to limit the extent and need for expensive and disruptive engineering repair works at the insured property. In this instance the estimated repair costs are likely to vary between ??25,000 and ??105,000, depending upon whether the tree/s can be removed or must remain. 3. The above tree works are proposed to limit the extent and need for costly CO2e emissions relating to alternative engineering repair works at the insured property. A typical underpinning scheme can include a carbon cost of more than 6000 kg CO2e and soil stabilisation or root barriers more than 4000 kg CO2e. A typical tree might capture between 15-40kg CO2e per annum and would therefore take centuries to mitigate the cost in CO2e on any alternative. We also confirm that the applicant has included this scheme and application in its tree planting and carbon capture off-set scheme for trees causing subsidence to low rise buildings which has already seen some 11,000 trees planted and additionally 220 tonnes of carbon captured. 3. The above tree works are proposed to limit the duration of any claim period and therefore allow the landowner their right to the peaceful enjoyment of their property. 4. It is the case that an alternative to felling such as pruning or significant ???pollarding??? of the tree would not provide a reliable or sustainable remedy to the subsidence in this case. We do not consider that any other potential means of mitigation, including root barriers, would be effective or appropriate in the circumstances. 5. We are satisfied that the evidence obtained following comple...

To remove rotten wood and trim back oak tree from hitting next door house and hitting cars on the road. To trim back to boundary fence to stop falling branches.

T42 Crown trim by at least 20% including all epicormic growth. Reduction from property by minimum of 2 meters to suitable growth point. Remove dead wood throughout. T45 complete removal down to stump, due to increasing threat from falling deadwood. light reduction and future maintenance costs.