T1 - 7 x LAWSON CYPRESS - Fell - Shading house subsidence on single storey extension. T2 - PINUS - Fell - 95% yellow needles. T3 - LAWSON CYPRESS GROUP - Fell - 70% die back. T4 - WESTERN RED CEDAR - Fell 70% die back. T5 - 14 X MIXED SIZE LEYLAND CYPRESS - Fell - Coryneum Canker present.

T1 - Yew - fell because of obstruction to vehicles entering and exiting the Applicant's property and due to establishment of new driveway. T2 - Red Horsechestnut - reduce crown by 3 metres due to excessive shading and reduce weight from crown. T3 - London Plain - crown lift by 5 metres and cut overhanging branches back by 3 metres due to close proximity to house and garage. G1 - Group consisting of 1 Beech, 2 Horse Chestnuts and 2 Limes in neighbouring garden - Crown lift to 5 metres on Applicant's side only and cut back over extended limbs on Applicant's side only by 3 metres to improve light into Applicant's garden and new flowerbed. G2 - Group consisting of 4 Willows on river bank - repollard to previous growth points. G3 - Group consisting of 3 Sycamores - Crown lift by 5 metres. T4 - Conifer - remove small skinny conifer next to large conifer due to lack of space to grow for larger conifer. T5 - Ash - fell to ground level as half of the tree is dead. T6 - Maple - crown lift by 5 metres. T7 - Magnolia - fell to ground level due to close proximity to Applicant's new extension and patio.

Remove Cherry Tree (self sown) - too close to wall of the property, within 20cm distance. Property itself is a grade 2 thatched 17th century cottage. Roots in danger of causing damage to property wall, also water mains below ground in adjacent garden area. Anglia Water/ Cambridge Water have been called out twice within the past 10 years to deal with underground mains leaks which could be related to root system. Branches of the tree touch and extend above overhead telephone cables which cross the front of the property along South End. It would be inappropriate to replace with a similarly sized tree as the area at the front of the house, where the cherry tree is growing, is too small and its proximity to the house is the problem.

TPO 0017 (2007) G1: T1 Oak to lift over driveway by 1.0 metre; remove low limb overhanging extension to neighbouring property; cut back by 2.0 metres limb growing towards house (all to ensure building clearance and vehicular clearance over drive). T2 Beech to raise crown to 4.0 metres above driveway, maintaining natural canopy lines (all to ensure building clearance and vehicular clearance over drive). T3 Silver Birch to raise crown to 4.0 metres above driveway, maintaining natural canopy lines (all to ensure building clearance and vehicular clearance over drive).

TPO 0005 (1960) A1: T1 Ash tree - 3.5m crown reduction/pollard where possible. (This tree has in the past exhibited Innonotus Hispidus bracket fungus. It also has several pockets of rot, one at the bifocation on the main stem. It is situated over the back extension of the house with a lean towards the property.) T2 - Ash tree - Dismantled to ground level and replaced with another native species. (This tree has in the past exhibited Innonotus Hispidus bracket fungus. It has already had one large bough fail and very nearly destroy the large green house underneath. This tree is also showing signs of decay high in the tree with pockets of rot throughout and at the base, where the bark is clearly falling away as a result of the fungus.)

Works to extend university fibre optic network to connect local buildings on site at Westfield House 30 Huntingdon Road, tree varieties involved are; T1 - horse chestnut, T2 - Sycamore, T3 - Scots Pine, T4 - Yew, T5 - Holly.

TPO 0005 (1960) A1: T1 - Ash tree - This tree has in the past exhibited Innonotus Hispidus bracket fungus. It also has several pockets of rot, one at the bifocation on the main stem. It is situated over the back extension of the house with a lean towards the property. Concern has been raised by the owners that are worried about potenial damage if this tree should fail. In addition to this problem the tree contributes the heavy shade in the back garden. I propose a 2m crown reduction to suitable growth points where possible. These works are to be carried out in High summer and the aim is to pull the branches away from the house and reduce weight, shade and sail. T2 - Ash tree - This tree has in the past exhibited Innonotus Hispidus bracket fungus. It has already had one large bow fail and very nearly destroy the large green house underneath. This tree is also showing signs of decay high in the tree with pockets of rot throughout and at the base, where the bark is clearly falling away as a result of the fungus. There is once again also the matter of heavy shade. I propose a 2m crown reduction to suitable growth points where possible. These works are to be carried out in high summer.