TPO ref: 942 G1 - LIME x 3 - Located on the boundary of No 191 Hanwell House - Would like to Re-Pollard to previous points removing up to 2m of new growth. G2 - LIME x 7 - Located on the boundary of Elthorne Avenue - Would like to Re-Pollard to previous points removing up to 2m of new growth. G3 - LIME x 6 - Located on the boundary of Elthorne Avenue - Would like to Re-Pollard to previous points removing up to 2m of new growth. These works are all for routine maintenance purposes.

T1 Large Eucalyptus: Reduce canopy by 30% approx. 2-3m from all aspects to shape, lower height of Ivy by 3-4m. Reason: Becoming to large, fast growing, to maintain given potential size at maturity. T2 Horse Chestnut clad with Ivy with large suckering stem: Lower Ivy to 3m and reduce remainder by 25% approx. 2m from height and width to balance and shape. Reason: Close to wall, poor form with suckering stem, for general maintenance. T3 Yew: Reduce canopy by 15% up to 1,5m to contain and shape, remove dead weak branches. Reason: becoming overcrowded and blocking light, general maintenance. T4 Robinia Pseudoacacia: Reduce canopy by 20% approx 1-2m and lower Ivy down to 3m. Reason: Veteran tree, to reduce weight and balance canopy. T5 Yew: Fell to ground level. Justification - Exposed root and soil heave, A Symmetrical, heavy shading, branches affecting neighbour and hitting property, poor form suppressing adjacent trees and shading lawn. T6, 7 X2 Holly: Reduce by 25% up to 1.5m to balance and shape. Reason: Leaning into house and supressed by surrounding trees, leggy, for general maintenance and to balance. T10 , 11 , 12 - X3 Row of Lime trees: Reduce height by approx. 3m, reduce remaining aspects by 1-2m to shape, raise to 5.5 statutory requirement over highway. Reason: Overgrown and crowded, heavily impacting on highway and blocking light to garden, T9 Ivy Clad tree: Reduce by approx. 2m to shape and reduce weight / wind sail. Reason: Ivy growth only to reduce weight and wind sail and maintain aesthetics. T8 Oak: Reduce by up to 1.5m all round, remove dead weak and crossing branches, target prune dead stubs. Reason: Unsuitable for location at maturity, to contain and shape, poor form and poor previous pruning, some die back possibly due to ground compression. TPO/2008/0601

1 x Oak - Fell to ground level Reason: Significant decay at base; dyiing back; hazardouns tree adjacent to road, house and pavement.

The clients would like to cut back overhanging limbs on a large London plane tree which is on the roadside and overhanging into her garden. The garden is small and the tree is overbearing so there is no sunlight and is even touching the house.

T1/T2 Bay: Fell to ground level - blocking light, becoming unmanageable and very close to front of house, roots affecting hard-standing. T3 Robinia: Fell to ground level - Decay at base is extensive and as a result the tree would continue to decay quick than it can compartmentalize, the decay thus compromising the structural integrity.

T1 mature London plane (Platanus ? acerifolia) rear garden of 34 Dordrecht Road T2 mature London plane (Platanus ? acerifolia) rear garden of 34 Dordrecht Road T3 mature London plane (Platanus ? acerifolia) boundary of 34 & 36 Dordrecht Road Pollarding work to the three mature London plane trees as outlined above to leave a finalised height of approx. 12m above ground level, and radial spread of approx. 12m (The current overall height of the tallest trees T1 & T3 including re-growth is approx. 19m above ground level and the total radial spread is approx.20m). This reduction work will involve the removal of approx. 5-6m of re-growth and further pruning into scaffold timber past previous pollard points by approx. 3m to leave the finalised height of approx. 12m above ground level. All sides growth and lateral spread will be reduced as necessary to form a rounded and more compact framework to create a sensible overall shape and dimension for their residential garden location and to allow uniform future re-growth which can be managed on an approx. 2-3 year cycle to provide continued amenity value to the neighbouring houses and street scene when viewed from the house frontages. Please see attached report for summary of reasons for the work.

Two dead trees in danger of falling. Possibly subject of a Tree Preservation Order. Both trees are at the road side of Sandgate House. It is not intended to plant new trees as they would be too close to the building line and the flats have suffered from subsidence through trees in the past.

T1-Plum Raise crown over lawn by 1-2m and reduce lateral spread over lawn by 1-2m from branch tips in order to provide more clearance. T2-Oak Large mature tree with a wide-spreading and full crown. Previous history of a large scaffold limb failure over the neighbouring property. Suggested works are to selectively reduce the protruding lateral spread over the garden (Western side only) by 2-3m from branch tips and back into the main canopy outline. Thin crown by 10% ensuring an even distribution of internal foliage. Remove all large diameter dead branches and the large stub on the lower Northern side. The reasons for these works are to contain the spread of the tree avoiding the need for larger diameter pruning cuts in the future, the aim is not for a full crown reduction at all. T3- Horse Chestnut Ivy clad on the main trunk and scaffold. Lateral spread encroaching on the building and overhanging guttering. Close proximity to the house and outgrowing location. Suggested works are to reduce the crown by 3m in height and 2-3m laterally from branch tips. (Or as much as allowed my local planning authority) Shear Ivy back to main trunk and thin lightly by 10%. The reasons for these works are to contain the growth of the tree and maintain it relative to its surroundings as it is beginning to cause issues with the property.