Listed Building Consent - Refurbishment and alteration of the existing single-storey rear extensions of Hall Cottage and replacement of windows to main house.

Refurbishment and alteration of the existing single-storey rear extensions of Hall Cottage and replacement of windows to main house

Variation of Condition No.2 of DC/20/3631/VOC - Variation of Condition No.2 of DC/20/1573/FUL -Alterations and renovation of existing house and construction of single storey extension with mezzanine level to the east. Demolition of West facing entrance lobby, WC and Shower. North facing first floor bathroom and WC, North facing ground floor log store. East facing first floor bathroom dormer, Boiler roof. Drawing room garden doors and roof over - We wish to omit the loft conversion from the project and have altered the drawings accordingly so there is no new access. The existing loft hatches will be retained and the loft space will continue to be used for storage only - Introduce three dormer windows to serve two proposed loft bedrooms & reduce the size of one new north facing window in bedroom 3.

Variation of Condition Nos. 4 and 5 of DC/19/3655/LBC - Listed Building Consent - Small extensions to Kitchen and Side entrance; Removal of cementious render from main house and associated internal alterations - Site Meeting, Schedule of Works & Doors & Windows

Listed Building Consent - In the process of repairing extensive water damage to the flat we had to deconstruct a non original single skin plasterboard and timber partition due to the extent of the water damage. It was presenting a danger and health hazard and putting the building at risk of rot. During this process we revealed what we realise must have been the original room with all its original cornicing intact. We believe it is the only room on the ground floor of Arnold House now in its original state. We would love to use the room in this form and preserve the grandeur of the original design. Since keeping it as a single grand space would mean the loss of a bedroom and we have 2 children, we also seek permission to move the kitchen across to one wall of this space. The proposed design is created to be unobtrusive in the room, as the proposed plan demonstrates. We will not need to impact the original wall as boxed in services are already in existence along this wall which we will make use of. At no point will any windows or original features be intruded upon.We have taken care to preserve the original flooring under sheets of hardboard with underlay and a click flooring system above. We have made no holes or nails in the original flooring, should it one day be restored. Our proposed alteration would allow the flat to preserve the grandeur of its original design whilst enabling contemporary family living.

Demolition of existing garage, erection of new garage with home office over, linking boot room, new single storey rear extension, and new front entrance gable. Addition of new through coloured render to the main house. Installation of new entrance gates. Alterations to existing fenestration and associated works.

Non Material Amendment of DC/20/3882/FUL - Alterations and extensions to Sutton Hall and alterations and change of use of former agricultural buildings to ancillary residential accommodation. - Minor modifications to the scheme currently consented:The rebuilding of loose/unsafe brickwork. Omission of external stair to Cellar and repair to existing Cellar floor. Adjustment in design to internal Study door. Lowered floor to Back Hall not to be lowered. Adjustment to opening of new Kitchen double doors to swing inwards. Increased depth to Kitchen terrace and planted border for better relationship between house and garden. Internal reconfiguration of the Garden Hall to provide a more functional Boots Room. Alterations to door and window openings in Garden Hall/Boots Room for local improvement. Omission of pilasters to new Back Porch to simplify design Not to block up the 1960s round window on the North Elevation. Dormer no longer needed to window WF07 to provide headroom at connection between two levels of the Service Wing. WF07 just to be window. Further information/details regarding proposed floor finishes. Details regarding proposals of fireplace to Drawing Room

Conversion of two terraced cottages to one house. Rear single storey and two storey extension. Internal alterations. New rooflights and window openings. New brick and flint wall to driveway. Demolition of rear garden wall.

Variation of Condition 2 of DC/21/5506/FUL - Construction of detached dwelling with detached double cartlodge and 2no. new vehicular accesses (one to serve new dwelling, one to serve host dwelling). - Condition 2 to be changed to include revised drawing references. These include minor alterations to the proposed scheme including the enlargement of the double cartlodge by 0.5m in each direction, a revised floor plan so that the house is now square in form, and various alterations to the proposed fenestration, all as shown on the attached drawings.

Discharge of Conditions - all planning conditions, but specifically: no.4 and 6 i , ii, iii. of DC/21/3640/LBC - Listed Building Consent - Replacement of pebble dash / render: It is intended to replace the existing failing pebbledash render with a smooth lime-based render as recommended in the pre-application advice, rather than a cement render, to allow the building to breathe, and this would look almost identical to the render replacement done on East Lodge, Melton. Alterations to entrance lobby: The proposed design includes a flat roof with a brick parapet detail which corresponds with the existing brick string course. The replacement door will be in a similar style to the existing front door with a glazed panel and the existing small side windows are to be removed. Reclaimed bricks would be used to ensure the new entrance compliments the existing house. The door would become a standard 2m door (instead of the 1.8m door which is currently there). Alterations to bathroom roof: Previous advice supported the principle of replacement of the roof as this appears to be a more modern addition and therefore unlikely to affect any historic fabric. It was also noted that the existing lower roofline to the bathroom reduces the visual impact of this element on the rest of the building and any raising of the roofline needs to be carefully designed to avoid a negative visual impact. The current proposal is to push the roof of the bathroom up by approximately 450mm (or less if an acceptable roof build up can be found). To the South East side a timber facia plate would be added to match the existing house. To the South West a gutter would run along the flat roof and connect into the existing gutter. This will allow the owner of the house to stand up in the shower (something he is currently unable to do).