Retention of trellis on side boundary fence adjoining number 42 New Road

Rowan (19333) - Fell x2 dead Rowans adj. to 3rd party lawn (next to fence & trampoline). Stack timber in woodland Leyland cypress (19335) - Fell dead cypress, stack timber in woodland Sycamore (19332) - Remove deadwood over 3rd party property. Woodland sycamore adj. to boundary.

Retention of fence (3 panels) to side boundary with Dulverton Avenue

Sycamore x2 and Birch x2 (adjacent to driveway at front of property) crown raised to 4m to increase levels of light into front garden and aestetic quality of the trees. Birch x1 to rear south easterly section of garden to have overall crown reduction, branches shortened approx 1.5m to maintain size of Birch in relation to size of garden and proximity to the property. Conifer x1 planted in neighbouring garden with canopy overhanging northerly property boundary with branches now physically touching or in very close proximity to the property. Shortern branches back to fence line/to give 1.5m clearance.

Declining Birch (B1) - adjacent to driveway/front boundary to Pinewood Drive reduce to ground level. Canopy is in decline, replace with 1x Oak tree in the front garden area. Silver Birch (SB1)(ID1698) - planted to North East corner of property to have branches growing towards property shortened to maintain a 2m clearance from the house. Conifers (x2)(C1&C2) - planted behind boundary fence to the Northerly boundary of the property (still owned by Harry Sutton even though planted behind the boundary) reduce to ground level. Poor specimens with low amenity value. Group of Semi-mature Silver Birch (GSB1)(three trees)(ID1691, ID1688, ID1681) planted in garden/lawn area reduced to ground level. Poor specimens with low amenity value and/or poor canopy distribution (lions tailed) and vitality. Replace with suitable native deciduous trees. Silver Birchx2 (SB2&SB3) planted in neighbouring property to the South of Harry Suttons property (housename Trees)(two largest out of the group) to have overall canopy reductions with branches shortened by approx 1.5m. To maintain size of canopy in relation to position within the garden and to increase levels of light to the Southerly side of the property. It would be ideal if the tree officer assigned to this application could have a walk around with Daniel prior to any decision making.

Application for approval of all revised boundary treatments (wood fencing as currently stated on the plans is considered inappropriate). as required by condition 03C of planning permission reference16/01106/FUL (Redevelopment of the site for 499 apartments (comprising of student accommodation))