Tree A - Silver Birch - removal of tree required as tree surgeon has confirmed that it is rotting from the top down due and will pose a danger if not removed. With young children, we do not want a fatality. HAR/CA21. Tree B (Fern) and Bush C (Holly) - we have recently received planning to extend the dwelling and as part of this work, we would like to landscape the garden. The fern and holly bush take up c.14 feet at the back of the garden and we are looking to remove these but replace them with new trees. The trees would be replaced with pleached holly trees (Nellie Stevens type). The fence is also rotten behind and will need replacing. The large Eucalyptus tree adjacent to the silver birch would remain but the crown reduced slightly as it is very high. A sketch idea of how the garden would look eventually is also included.

Tree group 1: mixed species along rear boundary of property, Hazel, Holly, Elder and dead hawthorn: Safely remove all trees in group and grind out remaining stumps in prep for landscaping and building of retaining wall. Trees are small and of little amenity value. HAR/CA34.

T1. Small silver birch to remove T2. Dying conifer to remove T3. Small Ash hard up to fence will become a problem remove. T4. Small 4 foot cherry not in great condition remove. All to make way for landscaping. HAR/CA26.

T1-Conifer Fell root damage lifting driveway & disturbing wall, also interfering with with telegraph pole. planted in unsuitable location. T2-Small Holly fell unsuitable location in the way of fence line. T3-Cherry fell dead. T4-Small Conifer fell unsuitable location in the way of fence line. T5-Laurel fell unsuitable location in the way of fence line. T6-Holly Crown-lift approx 3-4 meters. Client landscaping garden & will be planting better specimens in better locations. HAR/CA26.

T1 Oak, located within the rear LH corner of the garden. The tree is asymmetrical and has been poorly pruned by a previous contractor, to a very poor standard. The tree offers no value to the immediate landscape and further pruning would not improve its shape or vigour. Sectional fell and re-plant with a more suitable specimen. HAR/CA15.

All these plans are for a landscaping scheme & driveway access at the property better species will be replanted in more suitable locations.. T1- Conifer Fell. T2- Conifer Fell. T3- Conifer Fell. T4- Dead Lime Fell. T5- Dead Conifer. T6- Sycamore 20% Reduction. T7- Conifer Fell. T8- Conifer Fell. T9- Conifer Fell. T10- Conifer Fell. T11- Conifer Fell. T12- Yew Fell. T13- Silverbirch Fell. T14- Conifer fell. T15- Conifer Fell. T16- Conifer Fell. T17- Silverbirch Fell. T18- Conifer 30% Reduction. T19- Conifer 30% Reduction. T20- Conifer 30% Reduction. T21- Conifer 30% Reduction. T22- Conifer 30% Reduction. T23- Conifer 30% Reduction. T24- Conifer 30% Reduction. T25- Conifer 30% Reduction.T26- Conifer 30% Reduction. T27- Conifer 30% Reduction. T28- Conifer 30% Reduction. T29- Conifer 30% Reduction. T30- Conifer 30% Reduction. T31- Conifer 30% Reduction. T32- Conifer 30% Reduction. T33- Conifer Fell. T34- Conifer Fell. T35- Conifer Fell. T36- Conifer Fell. T37- Conifer Fell. T38- Conifer 30% Reduction. T39- Conifer 30% Reduction. HAR/CA29, TPO#: T8 - 127W.

T1 & T2 Leyland Cypress. Fell due to excessive size leading to shading of garden and long-term safety concerns given the roadside location of both trees. The applicant would like to landscape the garden and the trees currently occupy a huge area of the borders. They intend to replace them with an improved planting scheme to reinstate the screening from the road, but without the excessive size and overhang of the current cypresses above the pavement. T3 - Juniper - Fell due to poor form having been overrun with ivy. HAR/CA29.

We plan to cut down 4 Conifers which are located at the rear of our garden, along the fence line, they are not subject to TPO's. We have hired a landscape gardener who is undertaking all the work in the garden as well as employing a contractor to cut down the trees. We plan to replace these trees with different trees to grant us privacy from our neighbours. - HAR/CA15

The tree, the only one on the driveway at the front of the house, is a mature Rowan tree and I believe the wrong tree type was planted at the point in time when Waters Edge was built. The other driveway trees are all ornamental versions, rather than being standard size. There are several concerns with the tree, as follows: - Our neighbour (Number 13) has complained to us on several occasions and to the Council about the damage to his driveway caused by the large root structure of the tree. - The height of the tree is huge, our town house is 4 storey and the tree exceeds the height of the house quite significantly. As such, it blocks out light and may well be interfering with the joint drainage system that runs across the front of all the town houses within Waters Edge. - Due to the height and size of the tree, I also worry for my and my neighbours' properties should it, for any reason, fall. Loose branches do sometimes fall in strong winds and I am concerned that the larger the tree gets, the more damage it could cause to property if branches continue to fall. I am also concerned for the safety of the children that play around Waters Edge (including my own) and for the other occupants of the area (many of whom are elderly). The plan would be to resurface the driveway and put in place landscaping and a small ornamental tree, perhaps not in the same position, but within the driveway area so that the front garden remains pleasant in appearance. Several of our neighbours have already removed their trees or pollarded them significantly, so the removal of our tree would not look out of place. Tree at number 13 - heavily pollarded / Tree at number 15 - removed / Tree at number 11 - removed. - HAR/CA20

T1 Holly - Fell as the customer wants to re landscape the area and the Holly is unsightly. HAR/CA29, TPO#: 127W - G1, TPO#: 127W - A1, TPO#: 72W - A2