The work required is the the two trees which border the development and the public house, there are some dead branches and residents would like dead wood removed and these trimmed back to previous pruning points on the property side and removal of epicormic on the stem, so that it will allow more light into their properties. TPO 265E.

T1 unknown species. Tree is dead and very unstable. Fell and replant with cherry tree. T2 Conifer tree dying back and has poor V-type union at base of stem. Fell and replant with silver Birch in similar location. T3 Hornbeam covered in bracket fungus, canopy is heavily dying back. Fell and replant hornbeam in similar location. T4 Pin oak tree in rear garden. Upper canopy is dead with bark missing and is shedding branches onto childrens play area. Fell and replant with oak tree in similar location. T5 self seeded Ash tree growing under pin oak and into canopy of beech trees, proposal to fell due poor location and will effect the development of the beech tree and will be susceptible to Ash dye back. TPO 75W.

T1, Sycamore at the front right hand side. Fell tree. Tree is in decline, it has sparse foliage, development pressure or decay following the removal of a leader in the past look to be likely causes - TPO#: A1 - 16W

Variation of Condition 15 of DC/070682 to read as follows:- No dwelling hereby approved shall be occupied until detailed drawings of the site entrance, access road and pedestrian walkways within the approved development, which shall include the following details, have been submitted to and approved in writing by the local planning authority:- (i) A general arrangement / layout, based on a topographical survey and to a scale not less than 1:500, showing the entrance, carriageway and footpaths; (ii) A general site layout, showing the proposed buildings and boundaries, together with existing and proposed levels and entrance visibility splays; (iii) Longitudinal sections along the centre line and channel lines of the proposed road and footpaths showing the existing ground level and proposed road / path levels; (iv) Typical highway cross-sections, showing a specification for the entrance, carriageway and footpaths; (v) Full details of the surface water drainage proposals (including details of the main drainage system and any sustainable urban drainage or attenuation systems); (vi) Details of all proposed street lighting (which should use wildlife appropriate luminaires, task specific lighting and include the height of columns/mounting), signage, markings, structures and street furniture. No part of the development shall be occupied (unless otherwise agreed in writing by the local planning authority) until the site entrance, access road and footpaths have been constructed in accordance with the approved drawings and are available for use. Any visibility splays formed shall thereafter be kept clear of any structure, object, plant or tree exceeding the height specified on the approved drawings. NMA to conditions 11,16 and 19 of DC/070682 (Amended)

Our application is required to allow us to crown lift the tree line & overhanging branches to 1.5m above the street lighting column at the car parking court to prevent further damage to our tenants cars with fallen branches etc. within our existing flatted development at Flats 1-20.Birchfield House.48 Hopes Carr.Stockport.SK1 3QN. Please note that all works will be carry out within the car parking court which is under our ownership. HAR/CA16.

TREE 1 - CONIFER IN FRONT GARDEN VERY CLOSE TO HOUSE SHADING THE PROPERTY HAD NO MAINTENANCE NOW GROWING THROUGH AND TANGLING THE TELEPHONE CABLES. application forms part of development application. TREE 2- CONIFER VERY CLOSE TO GARAGE AND HOUSE SHADING HOUSE IN PLACE WHERE KITCHEN EXTENSION IS PLANNED. TREE 3 - PINE LEFTHAND SIDE OF GARDEN VERY CLOSE TO HOUSE CAUSING EXCESSIVE SHADING IN PLACE WHERE KITCHEN EXTENSION IS PLANNED. TREE 4 - YEW ADJACENT TO PINE VERY CLOSE TO HOUSE CAUSING EXCESSIVE SHADING IN PLACE WHERE KITHCEN EXTENSION IS PLANNED. THIS TREE HAS LOTS OF MOULD AND DISEASE AS REPORTED BY TREE SURGEON WHO ADVISED. ALL TREES HAVE HAD NO MAINTENANCE SINCE PLANTING AND DO NOT ALLOW ANY LIGHT INTO REAR OF HOUSE. HAR/CA15, TPO#: 19N.

I'm not sure if the tree has an individual tpo as the map doesn't allow me to check from my mobile but it is in the conversation area and I did include it in a previous application for 52 the crescent to prune it for safety to reduce wind sail - app was granted. Permission now requested to remove the large pollarded horse chestnut situated close to the building and over the neighbours impending permitted development of a new garage soon to be erected. The tree is mature and last year lost a big limb in the storm it was hanging in the canopy over the neighbours current outbuilding and driveway so they couldn't park underneath it. Iv looked at the tree for pruning but there are no sufficient growing points to prune back to inline with bs3998:2010 because the canopy is in effect a huge coppice growing from old rotten wounds. The cause of the big limb failing was poor fusion of the new crown due to topping. I think removal is warranted because the tree is structurally defected due to improper pruning. If it is decided the removal is not agreeable can we request a report to send to the clients insurance company, supporting the retention of the tree and also some advice regarding a pruning programme that is appropriate and will minimise risk to public and property. HAR.CA10, TPO#: 72N.