Part retrospective: Erection of fencing to the front boundary

G1 - Woodland Tree Line - Located on boundary, to rear/side of No. 64 Boundary Way. Consisting of 2x Mature Sycamore shown as T1 & T2, located close to the boundary line, with considerable overhang to property and garden area of no.64. Reduce overhanging laterals to reduce overextended limbs of Sycamore tree by 4.5M. Remove or carry our end-weight reduction to lower limbs in close proximity to house roof line, to provide suitable crown clearance from roofline of property block. To alleviate crown encroachment and light filter issues to property and garden, while reducing end weight to crown, reducing risk of limb failure to over extended limbs. Fell X1 Self-set Sycamore T3, located close to fence boundary. height approx 6/7m Fell and remove due to low value and poor siting growing under established trees. Further crown growth will likely cause continual conflict to adj property and boundary.

Replacement of close boarded fence with picket fence and associated landscaping

Discharge of Condition 3 (Soft landscaping and planting schedule) and Condition 4 (Fencing Details) pursuant to planning permission 23/0238/FUL

Lawson Cypress x 4 - T1, T2, T3 & T4 Fell the 4 trees to ground level. Due to poor condition as once was maintained as a hedge, now overgrown on old pruning points creating over extended thin tops with potential for failure next to neighbouring property and electrical substation. Additional works for low level vegetation removal at front of substation (A1), although not part of the application due to exemptions of stem diameter size for vegetation. Removal of area necessary for reinstatement of security fence around substation.

Single-storey front extension to garage and increase in height to attached garage and conversion of garage into habitable accommodation; two-storey rear infill extension; and increase in land levels to rear amenity garden and construction of rear retaining wall and fence

Neither myself nor our neighbour can identify the species of tree as it is pretty much dead. We are both in agreement that the tree can be removed subject to the councils approval as it is damaging the fence and parts of the tree appear dead. They also have a lovely Laurel which we think will thrive once the tree is removed. There is only one tree to come down. I have spoken with Tom Hunnings from Penn Tree services and he advised that the best course of action would be to remove the branches and because of the health of the tree the whole tree to come down - it is pretty much on the border of the properties.

Certificate of Lawfulness Proposed Development: Replacement of the existing play equipment with new play equipment, fencing and surfacing

Alterations to and extension of existing car park including the erection of fencing, hedging and landscaping works.

Replacement of existing pedestrian bridge over the river colne with a new pedestrian and cycle bridge including upgraded footpaths, fencing, seating areas.