To identify the tree of concern I have attached a Tree Survey File. On the drawing the tree is seen on the border of plot 2 and plot 3 labelled "Leylandii". Since the survey was completed the land has been sold for development and the resultant plots are slightly different resulting in the tree being on the very border of plot 2. I am the owner of plot 2. I will also include a few pictures of the tree. The tree is very large and over bearing. I would like to replace the tree with a number of smaller trees distributed around the plot. Design to be established by a landscape professional should approval be possible for the removal of the large tree,

G37 - group of Ash tree to reduce back lateral spread from garden by 2.5m these trees are overhanging the lawn area by a huge amount and starting to create a tunnel effect. The proposed works will retain height along with a natural look while opening up the garden space and view G39 - group of Ash and Hawthorns to reduce back lateral spread from garden by 2m these trees are overhanging the lawn area by a huge amount and starting to create a tunnel effect. the proposed works will retain height along with a natural look while opening up the garden space and view T133 - Ash to lift lower crown by 2m and cut back lateral spread back from garden by 2m to reduce tunnel effect in the garden while retaining natural look and height T134 - Ash fell to ground level. This tree is growing heavily over outbuildings and is causing issues with the solar panels. the proposed removal of this tree would not effect the outlook of the landscape as there garden is heavily planted with mature trees

G119- we would like to clear the deadwood from the tree. We would like to cut back the furthest over hanging branch, the most left branch in the photos provided. The reason being we have a lot of fallen branches from this tree, which falls on the children's playground. If we can just cut back the branch that mainly overhangs the area it will make it safer for them. T492- we lost a limb from the main union of the tree, during the storms in February. We have had a tree surgeon and Julie, tree and landscape officer, from the council to see the tree (and G119). We would like to reduce the tree by max 30%, to make this safer. The concern for the safety of the tree has been made because the branch was from the main union. the reduction will mainly come from the height as we would like to keep as much width as possible, as the beautiful tree will look odd. The reduction will be about 5 metres (30% of the tree height).

Pine tree on the front driveway - Crown reduction of 2 - 3 metres and a thin reduction of 30% and removing the lowest branches would stop or significantly reduce the roots growth. (Advised by TRDC Tree and Landscape Officer, Javier Garcia via email on 22/02/2021) Original request to fell the tree denied by LPA who placed a TPO on the tree. The tree is causing damage to driveway of property by lifting up block driveway, lifting up 3 man-hole covers located around the base of the tree and the roots of the tree are in very close proximity to mains water pipes.

42 trees mentioned in tree schedule of works supplied. Remove ten trees and carry out tree surgery to eight individual trees and two groups of trees in order to re-landscape the front and rear gardens of Cariad.

Conifer -T1-fell because of new driveway layout Deciduous Tree (unknown)-T2-fell to make way for new Amelanchier in planting design Malus / Crabapple-T3-fell to make way for new planting design Juniper -T4-fell because of new landscaping layout - new trees to be planted Fir-T5-fell because of new landscaping layout - new trees to be planted Conifer -T6-fell because of new landscaping layout - new trees to be planted Juniper -T7-fell because of new landscaping layout - new trees to be planted Conifer -T8-fell because of new landscaping layout - new trees to be planted Blue Conifer-T9 -fell because of new driveway layout Betula pendula -T10-fell because of new landscaping layout - new trees to be planted nearby Betula pendula -T11-fell because of new landscaping layout - new trees to be planted nearby Conifer -T12-fell because of new landscaping layout - new trees to be planted in borders Juniper -T13-fell because of new landscaping layout - new trees to be planted in borders Conifer -T14-fell because of new landscaping layout - new trees to be planted nearby Conifer -T15-fell because of new landscaping layout and to give Liriodendron more room Prunus sp/ Cherry-T16-fell because of new landscaping layout Prunus sp/ Cherry-T17- fell because of new landscaping layout Conifer -T18-fell because of new landscaping layout Deciduous Tree (unknown)-T19 -fell because of new landscaping layout and in poor condition Prunus sp/ Cherry-T20 -fell because of new landscaping layout and in poor condition Fruit tree -T21- fell because of new landscaping layout and in poor condition Fruit tree-T22-fell as in poor condition, covered in Ivy Laburnum x waterii-T23 -fell as in poor condition, leaning & covered in Ivy

On northern boundary On common T1-Beech(Fagus sylvatica) -cut back all overhanging branches ONLY back to boundary line up to 8m above ground level to allow 4m separation from building On common land T2-English Oak(Quercus robur) -cut back all overhanging branches ONLY on inbound side by up to 3m from tip to close to boundary line up to 6m above ground level-this will also help rebalance tree On east facing main lawn area T3-Large Beech(Fagus sylvatica) -reduce crown by 25%(4m from tips) to suitable growth points -reduce back lateral branch length to match(2m) -lift crown by 2m removing lowest branches back to main trunk collar Works to reduce overall height of tree to reduce overshading of proposed re-landscape garden T4-Beech(Fagus sylvatica)-small volunteer' specimen from larger tree -section fell to ground level-tree has poor aesethic appearance as has been shaded out by large tree and in turn due to its' current size is now shading out the larger tree; owner intends to re-plant with smaller indiginous species during proposed extensive re-landscaping works On boundary in Cherry Laurel hedge T5-Sycamore(Acer pseudoplatanus)-long-time dead-heavily covered in ivy growth -straight fell to ground level -dismantle at ground level and remove from site for disposal

Tree number - T1 Tree type - Oak (Quercus robur) Approx Height - 16m Location - Rear garden, Left hand boundary Service - Section dismantle Work required- Section dismantle tree to ground level. Cut stump as close to tree's current ground level as possible and treat with glyphosate to prevent regrowth. Reason - Tree is in decline with only one live branch still visible at time of visit. Potential hazard in adverse weather conditions. Tree number - G1 Tree type - 2x Cypress and 1x Rhododendron Approx Height - 3-6m Location - Rear garden, centre Service - Fell and grind Work required- Fell and grind out stumps to a minimum of 250mm below the stumps current ground level and leave all stump's arising to allow for ground settlement. Reason - To open up rear section of garden, allow mature and specimen trees adequate space and to allow re-establishment of lawn area. Tree number - SG1 (4x small stumps) Location - Rear garden, Left hand boundary Service - Grind out the stumps to a minimum of 250mm below the stump's current ground level and leave all grindings. Please note in-fill grindings mound will be left above ground level to allow for settling. Reason - to allow hard landscaping. Tree number - T2 Tree type - Whitebeam (Sorbus aria) Approx Height - 9m Location - Rear garden, Right hand boundary Service - Crown Reduction Work required- (previously reduced) Reduce crown by up to 3m in height and 2m spread, pruning to suitable growth points/branch fork junctions. Reason - To maintain at a reasonable size for the location, allow more light and reduce encroachment over adjacent garden.