Crown Reduce the entire tree canopy of Oak tree overhanging the courts and extremity of the grassed area in line with the edges of the courts and neighbours fence (tree stem is c.3-5metres from boundary). Pruning wounds 75-100mm in diameter.

T3 - Raise crown to 3m. Ivy to 1.5m. Remove T7 - Clean out dead wood and remove south stubs to collar. Raise crown to 2m. Reduce crown North by 2m and west by 1m to balance crown. ( see photos) T24 - Ivy to 4m sever and remove T25 - Ivy to 4m remove. Shoots ground level to 2m, remove to all 2m T26 - Ivy to 4m Sever and remove T30 - Ivy to 4m Sever and remove T31 - Ivy to 2m Sever and remove at 1.5m. Smaller failed young tree 3.6m to SW to 5m height 150mm? stem arching over footpath west Remove T35 - Ivy to 6m sever and remove at 1.5m. T23 - Remove damaged tear out 1st order limb back to collar / fence line at 1.8m T20 - Shoots from Ground level remove.

Birch (T1) crown reduction because of proximity/contact/overhang with house (11 Primrose Way) resulting in height of approx. 8.5m and spread from trunk of approx. 3m into 11 Primrose Way Ash (T2) crown reduction because of contact with fencing (between 11 and 15 Primrose Way) and low overhang above neighbouring property (15 Primrose way) resulting in height of approx. 8m and spread from trunk of approx. 4m into 11 Primrose Way

The property has two TPO's for Lime trees. In the original planning application submitted (prior to our purchase) a plan was outlined to put protective fencing up and protect 3 trees, one of which has no TPO against it. For the purpose of this application I will identify them as follows: TR1: Tree at the back of the property NOT under a TPO (see sketch) TR2: Lime Tree at the top right of the property. A lime tree under a TPO (T1) TR3: A lime tree that has already had prior approval to remove and replace in line with planning application : 20/01204/FUL The original tree protection plan associated to the planning application was submitted by Iain Tavendale. Iain had never been to the property and therefore the issues outline below have not previously been raised. The issues are summarised as follows: 1. TR1: Tree not covered by the TPO. The root of this tree has embedded into the brick work on the boundary of the property causing the brickwork to become unstable. This is not only causing damage to the boundary of the property, but more importantly causing imminent danger to neighboring residents. The other side of the boundary is a drop onto another property. If the brick work falls, it could cause serious injury. As this is not covered by a TPO but was submitted to be protected in the original plan we would like to remove this tree and replace the brickwork. Pictures and supporting evidence has been supplied. Please see Image 1 and Image 2. TR2: This is a Lime tree that is covered by an existing TPO. The root of this tree are also going into the brickwork of the boundary wall and causing damage. As the brickwork isn't high (like TR1) there is no imminent risk of danger to the public. As there is no imminent risk to the public we do not need to immediately remove the tree. In the first instance we would like permission to trim parts of the tree overhanging onto the public footpath and trim the additional tree branches growing out of the base of the tree (pic...

T1 Oak - Draw back by 2m on all sides, crown raise to 4m, crown thin 10%. T2 Sycamore- Draw back by 3m on all sides, crown raise to 4m, crown thin 10%. All work to allow light between fence height and tree as houses sit low.

Poplar trees T1 and T2 - fell or reduce in height because they being badly affected by the wind which is causing large branches to break off into adjacent properties. Neighbours have raised concerns about the falling branches because of children playing in the garden. The house at 60 Woolgreaves Drive WF2 6DR are getting the main impact and their fence and garden are regularly damaged by large falling branches.

G23 and G24 mixed species. Highways have asked for trees over footpath to be drawn back to fence, raised to 2.3m over footpath, up to 5.2m over carriageway and clearance round street light.

We initially communicated with the Council via Mr Stubbings who has now left the Council. In essence we have a huge cedar tree in our garden, less than 10 metres from the house and 2 metres from where our grandchildren play Although the tree is in a Conservation Area, we previously requested removal due to the potential danger, to us, our house and our grandchildren, and in return have offered to fund the planting of 2 trees in a location of the Councils choice, Mr Stubbings refused and placed a TPO on it The tree is not native and is over 2 times the height of our house and has recently dropped quite sizeable branches near to the house. Since it's over a year since we first asked, we've now been requested, via a conversation I had with local MP Mr Imran Khan (he subsequently got a response from Judy Jones) to submit a new application We haven't engaged an arborist, although we have had discussions with two and being honest they were professionally doubtful if they could 100% say the tree was a short term danger. However as I stated earlier it towers over twice the height of our house and is only 10 metres away from that and 2 from our grandkids play area. In previous discussions I only focussed on the danger factor, however there are several other concerns; . Every 6 months or so we have to have our gate repaired due to damage by the tree's growth . Likewise to the path we have needs to be lifted and reset . And also to the adjacent fence has been damaged . Our garden and that of our neighbours are devalued due to the lack of light and incessant dropping of pine needles . Our TV reception is inhibited and we have recently had to spend money to only partly resolve . The previous owner of the house cut the tree many years ago and it now sprouts 3 trunk's instead of one, so we have an ugly huge fir to contend with We're trying to be constructive and reasonable and thereby affirm our suggestion that we 100% fund the removal and planting of 2 new ones.

've Prune Beech located at the back of property according to the following specifications: . Selective prune to clear building and roof by a minimum of 2.0m . Raise lower branches to a height of 2.4-2.5 metres to improve clearance over grass area/fence. Remove resulting debris and recycle wood products responsibly.

T5 - Oak - Reduce crown by 30% and reshape T7 - Oak - Deadwood, crown lift to clear security fence and light T8 - Oak - Dead tree, fell to ground level. G19 - Mixed Species - Fell Spruce x 2 opp gatehouse. Remove dead wood / crown lift to 5m x 15 around car park. Crown reduce Oak (with 5mph sign attached) by 30%. Partial crown reduce to clear building x 4 adjacent to visitor centre G20 - Mixed Species - Fell dead / dying Birch x 3. Fell oak overhanging training centre. Remove major dead wood in grassed area and overhanging footpath, road and buildings x 30. Remove Beech tree adjacent to training centre due to 'Kretzschmaria deusta'. PLUS ADDITIONAL WORK IDENTIFIED DURING TREE OFFICER SITE VISIT - remove 2no.dying Beech trees in car park opposite Guvnors parking and replace with 1no. Oak tree