Remove ivy and epicormic growth from T3 - Sycamore within TPO WMDC 14 Various works to other trees within the Conservation Area boundary as detailed in the Supporting Documentation accompanying the Application Form.

T1 Leylandii Fell part of the crown recently split off into the highway leading to concerns about the trees ongoing stability. T2 & T3 Fell both. They are growing close to the boundary of the property with the canopy extending low over the highway. As T1 there is a risk of stems splitting into the highway. The removal of T 2 & T3 will also avoid complaints under the high hedges legislation from neighbouring property owners. Proposed replacement planting would be with native broadleaves including Rowan and Holly.

Unidentifiable as the tree is not in leaf at the moment - the tree branches are growing over into the adjacent property (a rental property) and the tree is hitting the house roof when it is windy. This application, on behalf of the letting agent, is prune any overhanging branches back to the boundary. Permission has been granted from the landowner and Wakefield Council currently maintain the church grounds.

Tree Works Notice of intended tree works in conservation area of Badsworth Meadow Mead, Main Street, Badsworth WF9 1AJ is a residential property situated off a private access road, with boundaries adjacent to St Mary's Church and The School House and Hall Farm Barn. The garden has been left untended for years by the previous owner resulting in many self-set, unsuitably positioned and potentially structurally damaging tree and shrub growth. As the current new owners, we provide notification of intended tree works designed to provide benefits to the longevity of some of the trees, safer surroundings, and an overall improvement to the site. Please note some recent cutting back of shrub and brambles has taken place by the previous owner in order to gain access to remove his property from the garden, including 3 derelict vehicles East facing boundary Meadow Mead T 1 Douglas fir (Christmas tree) to be removed , due to size and close proximity to bungalow, extensive root network having a detrimental effect on the surrounding garden West facing boundary of Meadow Mead T 2 Self set sycamore, approx 10m high generally reshape by pruning back leggy growth and crowning to achieve approx 3m reduction in height. T 3 Self set sycamore, approx 10m high, overhanging garden of Hall Farm Barn, work required to generally reshape by pruning back leggy growth and crowning to achieve approx 3m reduction in height.

The property has two TPO's for Lime trees. In the original planning application submitted (prior to our purchase) a plan was outlined to put protective fencing up and protect 3 trees, one of which has no TPO against it. For the purpose of this application I will identify them as follows: TR1: Tree at the back of the property NOT under a TPO (see sketch) TR2: Lime Tree at the top right of the property. A lime tree under a TPO (T1) TR3: A lime tree that has already had prior approval to remove and replace in line with planning application : 20/01204/FUL The original tree protection plan associated to the planning application was submitted by Iain Tavendale. Iain had never been to the property and therefore the issues outline below have not previously been raised. The issues are summarised as follows: 1. TR1: Tree not covered by the TPO. The root of this tree has embedded into the brick work on the boundary of the property causing the brickwork to become unstable. This is not only causing damage to the boundary of the property, but more importantly causing imminent danger to neighboring residents. The other side of the boundary is a drop onto another property. If the brick work falls, it could cause serious injury. As this is not covered by a TPO but was submitted to be protected in the original plan we would like to remove this tree and replace the brickwork. Pictures and supporting evidence has been supplied. Please see Image 1 and Image 2. TR2: This is a Lime tree that is covered by an existing TPO. The root of this tree are also going into the brickwork of the boundary wall and causing damage. As the brickwork isn't high (like TR1) there is no imminent risk of danger to the public. As there is no imminent risk to the public we do not need to immediately remove the tree. In the first instance we would like permission to trim parts of the tree overhanging onto the public footpath and trim the additional tree branches growing out of the base of the tree (pic...

All trees on street require a life clean, thinning and drawing back, from over boundary by 2 metres or to a suitable growing point.

Remove 8no. Sycamore trees on field boundary

T1: Cherry tree - To the left of the pergola in the photo - prune to manage growth. T2: Conifer - Conifer to rear (east boundary) - remove to ground level as it puts their pergola in the shade in the morning. T3: Conifer - To be cut to either (i) height of ridge of neighbour's garage (which will give a flat top an will probably be unsightly or (ii) remove completely as it puts the decking to the immediate rear of the house in shade in the afternoon.

I would want all over hanging branches taken back to boundary for safety since those branches are reach out to our roof. It has been raining and windy hence few branches have broken off. We have a 4 years old son and he plays in the garden alot and they become very unsafe for him.

G1 Group of Sycamore along back edge of property which reside in property to the rear. Branch drawback of canopy to 1 Holly Bank boundary approx max 3m to achieve clearance from garden area and overhanging the bungalow property. Cuts will be made at the appropriate places and the correct pruning methods will be used according to BS. All works will be from mewp no access will be required from the property in which the trees reside.